By Andrea Veltman, Mark Piper
This number of new essays examines philosophical concerns on the intersection of feminism and autonomy reports. Are autonomy and independence helpful ambitions for ladies and subordinate people? Is autonomy attainable in contexts of social subordination? Is the pursuit of wants that factor from patriarchal norms in step with self sustaining business enterprise? How do feelings and worrying relate to self sustaining deliberation? participants to this assortment solution those questions and others, advancing principal debates in autonomy conception by way of studying easy elements, normative commitments, and functions of conceptions of autonomy. numerous chapters examine the stipulations helpful for self sustaining organisation and on the position that values and norms -- resembling independence, equality, inclusivity, self-respect, care and femininity -- play in feminist theories of autonomy. while a few contributing authors concentrate on dimensions of autonomy which are inner to the brain -- equivalent to deliberative mirrored image, wants, cares, feelings, self-identities and emotions of self esteem -- a number of authors deal with social stipulations and practices that aid or stifle self sufficient employer, usually answering questions of functional import. those comprise such questions as: What kind of gender socialization top helps self sustaining employer and feminist pursuits? while does adapting to critically oppressive conditions, corresponding to these in human trafficking, become a lack of autonomy? How are beliefs of autonomy stricken by capitalism? and the way do conceptions of autonomy tell concerns in bioethics, equivalent to end-of-life judgements, or rights to physically self-determination?
Read Online or Download Autonomy, Oppression, and Gender PDF
Best social philosophy books
Extra resources for Autonomy, Oppression, and Gender
Liberal theorists who reject this claim and who seek to defend the rights of nation states to exclude immigrants include Michael Blake, “Immigration,” in Companion to Applied Ethics, edited by R. Frey and Christopher Heath Wellman (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2005), 224–237; David Miller, “Immigrants, Nations and Citizenship,” Journal of Political Philosophy 16:4 (2008): 371–390. This is of course a complex debate that I cannot enter into here, and I refer to it purely for illustrative purposes. , J.
The third premise is that social conditions restricting the exercise of self-determination are unjust. 19 A socially just society therefore has an obligation to develop social, legal, and political institutions that foster the autonomy of all citizens, particularly those from historically oppressed or marginalized social groups. It is worth clarifying two points about the understanding of justice that underlies this third premise. First, this account of justice assumes that injustice is not just a function of inequality in the distribution of resources; rather, it is also a function of inequalities in opportunities, and in social relations, institutions, norms, and practices.
Theorists who understand the freedom conditions for autonomy in terms of substantive freedom or opportunity think that although some degree of negative liberty is a necessary condition for autonomy it is insufficient. What matters for autonomy is the extent of a person’s substantive opportunities to be and to do. Autonomy-enabling opportunities require a lot more than freedom from interference; they require substantial support by other persons and by state agencies. 28 Joseph Carens and Phillip Cole are examples of theorists who argue that liberal political principles entail that freedom of international movement should be included among the basic liberties.
Autonomy, Oppression, and Gender by Andrea Veltman, Mark Piper